PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and TD Q International Low Volatility ETF (TILV.TO).

FCIV.TO and TILV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCIV.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada International Value Index. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025. TILV.TO is an actively managed fund by TD. It was launched on May 7, 2019.

Performance

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and TD Q International Low Volatility ETF (TILV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF		10.05%33.59%6.89%22.74%-0.22%14.15%5.34%
TILV.TO
TD Q International Low Volatility ETF		9.13%19.69%13.19%8.85%-4.94%14.06%3.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIV.TO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than TILV.TO's 9.13% return.

FCIV.TO

1D
2.69%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
10.05%
6M
13.24%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
—

TILV.TO

1D
1.91%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
9.13%
6M
11.75%
1Y
18.26%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity International Value ETF

TD Q International Low Volatility ETF

Often compared with FCIV.TO:
FCIV.TO vs. VI.TOFCIV.TO vs. FCIM.NEOFCIV.TO vs. FCID.TOFCIV.TO vs. VIDY.TOFCIV.TO vs. VIU.TOFCIV.TO vs. XFN.TOFCIV.TO vs. VDU.TO
Often compared with TILV.TO:
TILV.TO vs. VVO.TOTILV.TO vs. TINF.TOTILV.TO vs. FCRI.TOTILV.TO vs. QDX.TOTILV.TO vs. FCIL.NEOTILV.TO vs. ZLI.TOTILV.TO vs. RIDH.TO

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIV.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TILV.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF
TILV.TO
TD Q International Low Volatility ETF

Return for Risk

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FCIV.TO
FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
TILV.TO
TILV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TILV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TILV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and TD Q International Low Volatility ETF (TILV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FCIV.TOTILV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.59

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.14

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.42

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.57

9.39

+1.17

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the TILV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIV.TO and TILV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FCIV.TOTILV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.59

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.14

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.71

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between FCIV.TO and TILV.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than TILV.TO's 2.89% yield.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF		1.89%2.08%2.80%3.63%3.45%2.97%0.90%0.00%
TILV.TO
TD Q International Low Volatility ETF		2.89%3.08%3.34%3.51%2.81%2.78%2.99%2.10%

Drawdowns

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum TILV.TO drawdown of -26.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIV.TO and TILV.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

FCIV.TOTILV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.27%

-26.64%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-7.21%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.27%

-16.32%

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-2.20%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-4.31%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.96%

+0.88%

Volatility

FCIV.TO vs. TILV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to TD Q International Low Volatility ETF (TILV.TO) at 5.49%. This indicates that FCIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

FCIV.TOTILV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

5.49%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

7.79%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

11.51%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

9.90%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

11.57%

+4.02%