FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO).

FCIN.NEO and FGEP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCIN.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024. FGEP.TO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023.

Performance

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF	7.79%	26.32%	1.20%
FGEP.TO Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF	3.87%	17.44%	9.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIN.NEO achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than FGEP.TO's 3.87% return.

FCIN.NEO

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -2.29%
• YTD: 7.79%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FGEP.TO

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: 3.87%
• 6M: 6.17%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGEP.TO

Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF

Return for Risk

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIN.NEO

FCIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 77
FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FCIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FCIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FCIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FCIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FGEP.TO

FGEP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 80
FGEP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FGEP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FGEP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FGEP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FGEP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) and Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCIN.NEO	FGEP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	1.62	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.21	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.35	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	2.23	+0.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	10.39	-1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FGEP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIN.NEO and FGEP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCIN.NEO	FGEP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	1.62	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	1.35	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between FCIN.NEO and FGEP.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCIN.NEO nor FGEP.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum FGEP.TO drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIN.NEO and FGEP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIN.NEO	FGEP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.34%	-14.78%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-10.58%	+0.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-4.14%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-1.73%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	2.27%	+0.25%

Volatility

FCIN.NEO vs. FGEP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Fidelity Global Equity+ Fund ETF (FGEP.TO) at 4.70%. This indicates that FCIN.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGEP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIN.NEO	FGEP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	4.70%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	8.30%	+2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.63%	14.57%	+1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	12.75%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.87%	12.75%	+1.12%