FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO).
FCID.TO and FCMO.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCID.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2018. FCMO.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada U.S. Momentum Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020. Both FCID.TO and FCMO.NEO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 7.53% | 30.48% | 4.12% |
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF | -0.57% | 14.07% | 26.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCID.TO achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly higher than FCMO.NEO's -0.57% return.
FCID.TO
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FCMO.NEO
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCID.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMO.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCID.TO
FCMO.NEO
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCID.TO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 0.76 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 1.20 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.43 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 5.02 | +4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCID.TO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 0.76 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.96 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCID.TO and FCMO.NEO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FCMO.NEO's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 3.29% | 3.61% | 4.16% | 4.49% | 5.08% | 3.30% | 3.78% | 3.82% | 0.44% |
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCID.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than FCMO.NEO's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCID.TO and FCMO.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCID.TO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -21.77% | -12.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -13.90% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -6.77% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -3.12% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.96% | -1.09% |
Volatility
FCID.TO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) is 7.05%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that FCID.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCID.TO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 9.07% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 14.65% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 24.18% | -7.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 20.67% | -7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 20.67% | -3.87% |