FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF (FCGI.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO).
FCGI.TO and FGRO.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCGI.TO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 16, 2020. FGRO.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021.
Performance
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGI.TO Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF | 3.84% | 13.21% | 13.10% | 9.65% | -5.30% | 12.33% |
FGRO.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF | 1.05% | 17.00% | 25.97% | 16.92% | -6.29% | 16.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCGI.TO achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than FGRO.NEO's 1.05% return.
FCGI.TO
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FGRO.NEO
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 15.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGI.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRO.NEO's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCGI.TO
FGRO.NEO
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF (FCGI.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGI.TO | FGRO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.82 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.27 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.72 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 7.05 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGI.TO | FGRO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.28 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 1.27 | -1.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGI.TO and FGRO.NEO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than FGRO.NEO's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGI.TO Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF | 3.08% | 3.25% | 3.21% | 3.50% | 3.71% | 2.49% | 2.74% |
FGRO.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF | 1.23% | 1.24% | 1.09% | 1.39% | 4.58% | 0.94% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.42%, which is greater than FGRO.NEO's maximum drawdown of -15.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGI.TO and FGRO.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGI.TO | FGRO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.42% | -15.23% | -48.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -9.71% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.16% | -15.23% | +4.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.57% | -4.63% | -18.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.27% | -2.58% | -40.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.36% | -0.40% |
Volatility
FCGI.TO vs. FGRO.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Global Monthly High Income ETF (FCGI.TO) is 3.29%, while Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that FCGI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGRO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGI.TO | FGRO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 5.06% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.44% | 7.76% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.46% | 11.83% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.59% | 10.49% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 10.46% | +12.17% |