FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO).
FCCQ.TO and FBAL.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCCQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2019. FBAL.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021.
Performance
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 2.76% | 31.01% | 21.58% | 11.02% | -7.52% | 21.03% |
FBAL.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF | 0.90% | 12.92% | 19.42% | 13.96% | -7.02% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCQ.TO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than FBAL.NEO's 0.90% return.
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FBAL.NEO
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCQ.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBAL.NEO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCQ.TO
FBAL.NEO
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCCQ.TO | FBAL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.33 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 1.80 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 1.67 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 6.56 | +6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCCQ.TO | FBAL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.33 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.16 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.12 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCQ.TO and FBAL.NEO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCCQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than FBAL.NEO's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.53% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.31% | 1.90% | 2.10% | 2.30% |
FBAL.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF | 1.60% | 1.61% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 4.48% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than FBAL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCQ.TO and FBAL.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCQ.TO | FBAL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.31% | -13.83% | -21.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -7.39% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.97% | -13.83% | -4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -3.78% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -2.48% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 1.89% | +0.87% |
Volatility
FCCQ.TO vs. FBAL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) at 4.00%. This indicates that FCCQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBAL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCCQ.TO | FBAL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 4.00% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 6.03% | +6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 8.91% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 8.60% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 8.57% | +7.52% |