PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBP vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBP vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First BanCorp. (FBP) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBP vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBP
First BanCorp.
5.04%15.48%16.91%34.81%-4.71%53.12%-10.36%24.84%69.19%-22.84%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
-3.64%17.88%25.02%26.29%-18.11%28.71%18.40%31.49%-4.38%21.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBP achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than ^SP500TR's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FBP has outperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 25.01%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.17% annualized return.


FBP

1D
1.03%
1M
0.65%
YTD
5.04%
6M
1.26%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
25.01%

^SP500TR

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.34%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
18.20%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
14.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBP vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBP
FBP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBP vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First BanCorp. (FBP) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBP^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.59

1.00

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.00

1.52

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.54

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.72

7.32

-4.60

FBP vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBP and ^SP500TR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBP^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.00

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.71

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.62

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between FBP and ^SP500TR is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

FBP vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBP drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBP and ^SP500TR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBP^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.51%

-55.25%

-44.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.83%

-12.12%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.38%

-24.49%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.82%

-33.79%

-34.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.69%

-5.55%

-88.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.73%

-8.20%

-51.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

2.55%

+3.55%

Volatility

FBP vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

First BanCorp. (FBP) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBP^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.38%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.60%

9.55%

+10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.90%

18.32%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.36%

16.90%

+15.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.88%

18.05%

+21.83%