FBNC vs. LYG
FBNC (First Bancorp) and LYG (Lloyds Banking Group plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FBNC returned 13.97%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for LYG. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FBNC vs. LYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBNC achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than LYG's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FBNC has outperformed LYG with an annualized return of 13.97%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.
FBNC
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- 1Y
- 47.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
LYG
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
FBNC vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNC First Bancorp | 17.52% | 17.79% | 21.66% | -11.24% | -4.19% | 37.67% | -12.61% | 24.00% | -6.49% | 31.41% |
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 5.16% | 103.71% | 20.30% | 14.68% | -9.47% | 33.81% | -40.79% | 36.81% | -28.35% | 30.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBNC and LYG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2001 | 0.36 |
The correlation between FBNC and LYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FBNC:
$3.90
LYG:
$0.45
FBNC:
15.22
LYG:
12.17
FBNC:
1.84
LYG:
6.08
FBNC:
3.41
LYG:
0.94
FBNC:
$541.11M
LYG:
$65.49B
FBNC:
$277.30M
LYG:
$65.49B
FBNC:
$103.88M
LYG:
$7.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBNC vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank
FBNC
LYG
FBNC vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Bancorp (FBNC) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBNC | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.56 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 4.40 | +2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBNC | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.27 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.63 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.21 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.03 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
FBNC vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBNC drawdown since its inception was -70.98%, smaller than the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNC and LYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBNC | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.98% | -94.84% | +23.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | -22.72% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -22.72% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.98% | -40.19% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.13% | -68.72% | +14.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -56.54% | +52.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -63.42% | +42.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 8.06% | -1.53% |
Volatility
FBNC vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Bancorp (FBNC) is 7.75%, while Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that FBNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBNC | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 10.15% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.41% | 21.64% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.05% | 27.90% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.86% | 32.06% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 36.50% | -1.32% |
Dividends
FBNC vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison
FBNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than LYG's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBNC First Bancorp | 1.56% | 1.79% | 2.00% | 2.38% | 2.05% | 1.75% | 2.13% | 1.35% | 1.22% | 0.91% | 1.18% | 1.71% |
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3.67% | 3.19% | 5.44% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 5.04% | 6.63% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 2.11% |
Financials
FBNC vs. LYG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Bancorp and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FBNC vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison
FBNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 142.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LYG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
FBNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Bancorp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 142.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LYG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.
FBNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Bancorp reported a net income of 46.66M and revenue of 142.39M, resulting in a net margin of 32.8%.
LYG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBNC and LYG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYG has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to FBNC (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBNC dropped -70.98% vs LYG's -94.84%.
FBNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBNC and LYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer