FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) and Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio (VCIP.TO).
FBAL.NEO and VCIP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBAL.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. VCIP.TO is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Jan 29, 2019.
Performance
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAL.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF | 0.90% | 12.92% | 19.42% | 13.96% | -7.02% | 11.50% |
VCIP.TO Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio | 0.07% | 5.91% | 6.91% | 8.32% | -12.18% | 1.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAL.NEO achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than VCIP.TO's 0.07% return.
FBAL.NEO
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
VCIP.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAL.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIP.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FBAL.NEO
VCIP.TO
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) and Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio (VCIP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAL.NEO | VCIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.93 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.26 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.33 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 4.51 | +2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAL.NEO | VCIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.93 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.40 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.55 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAL.NEO and VCIP.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Dividend Comparison
FBAL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than VCIP.TO's 3.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAL.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF | 1.60% | 1.61% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 4.48% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCIP.TO Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio | 3.69% | 2.93% | 2.90% | 2.77% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 1.86% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, smaller than the maximum VCIP.TO drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAL.NEO and VCIP.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAL.NEO | VCIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -15.87% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.39% | -3.80% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.83% | -15.87% | +2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -2.60% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -3.65% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.12% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FBAL.NEO vs. VCIP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF (FBAL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Vanguard Conservative Income ETF Portfolio (VCIP.TO) at 2.42%. This indicates that FBAL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBAL.NEO | VCIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 2.42% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.03% | 3.45% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.91% | 5.02% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 5.64% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.57% | 6.25% | +2.32% |