FANAX vs. XLE
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Energy Fund Class A (FANAX) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE).
FANAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. XLE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FANAX or XLE.
Correlation
The correlation between FANAX and XLE is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
FANAX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FANAX:
-0.45
XLE:
-0.33
FANAX:
-0.39
XLE:
-0.21
FANAX:
0.94
XLE:
0.97
FANAX:
-0.42
XLE:
-0.36
FANAX:
-1.23
XLE:
-0.93
FANAX:
8.96%
XLE:
7.73%
FANAX:
26.70%
XLE:
25.31%
FANAX:
-76.21%
XLE:
-71.54%
FANAX:
-14.92%
XLE:
-11.85%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANAX achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FANAX has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 3.29%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.55% annualized return.
FANAX
-1.73%
6.54%
-8.57%
-11.97%
3.85%
22.27%
3.29%
XLE
-0.74%
3.52%
-10.68%
-8.23%
4.77%
21.38%
4.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FANAX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FANAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FANAX vs. XLE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FANAX
XLE
FANAX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Energy Fund Class A (FANAX) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FANAX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
FANAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than XLE's 3.39% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANAX Fidelity Advisor Energy Fund Class A | 0.97% | 0.95% | 2.06% | 2.08% | 2.14% | 3.28% | 1.59% | 0.81% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 6.21% |
XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.39% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 5.73% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
FANAX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANAX drawdown since its inception was -76.21%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANAX and XLE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FANAX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Energy Fund Class A (FANAX) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) have volatilities of 6.94% and 6.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
User Portfolios with FANAX or XLE
Recent discussions
Portfolio by date created
Ryan M Dorsey
Transactional Portfolio Use
I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.
The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?
EG
AI
Farshad