F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR) (F4DE.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE).

F4DE.DE and 5HEE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. F4DE.DE is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Ossiam Food for Biodiversity. It was launched on Dec 30, 2020. 5HEE.DE is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018. Both F4DE.DE and 5HEE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR) (F4DE.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
F4DE.DE Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR)	0.00%	-13.57%	9.90%	5.21%	-11.35%	18.46%
5HEE.DE Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)	-1.15%	-7.39%	10.30%	11.99%	-11.48%	31.39%

Returns By Period

F4DE.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

5HEE.DE

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -5.11%
• YTD: -1.15%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: -1.39%
• 3Y*: 1.63%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both F4DE.DE and 5HEE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

F4DE.DE

Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR)

5HEE.DE

Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR)

Return for Risk

F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5HEE.DE

5HEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 12
5HEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
5HEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
5HEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
5HEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
5HEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Food for Biodiversity UCITS ETF 1A (EUR) (F4DE.DE) and Ossiam ESG Low Carbon Shiller Barclays CAPE® US Sector UCITS ETF (EUR) (5HEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	F4DE.DE	5HEE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.51	—

Correlation

The correlation between F4DE.DE and 5HEE.DE is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

F4DE.DE vs. 5HEE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither F4DE.DE nor 5HEE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	F4DE.DE	5HEE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.56%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-12.59%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	F4DE.DE	5HEE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.06%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	14.90%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.99%	—