EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Exmar NV (EXM.BR) and Exail Technologies (EXA.PA).
Performance
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXM.BR Exmar NV | 0.70% | 120.77% | 67.59% | 101.23% | 106.93% | 69.22% | -47.92% | -11.71% | -7.30% | -16.32% |
EXA.PA Exail Technologies | 60.74% | 369.47% | -10.05% | -1.93% | 21.98% | 75.06% | -24.06% | 106.52% | -45.24% | -25.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXM.BR achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than EXA.PA's 60.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EXM.BR has outperformed EXA.PA with an annualized return of 26.22%, while EXA.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 23.85% annualized return.
EXM.BR
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 120.77%
- 3Y*
- 82.93%
- 5Y*
- 83.18%
- 10Y*
- 26.22%
EXA.PA
- 1D
- 10.08%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 60.74%
- 6M
- 32.99%
- 1Y
- 235.04%
- 3Y*
- 91.70%
- 5Y*
- 61.90%
- 10Y*
- 23.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA — Risk / Return Rank
EXM.BR
EXA.PA
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exmar NV (EXM.BR) and Exail Technologies (EXA.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXM.BR | EXA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 3.40 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.60 | 3.42 | +2.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.43 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.86 | 6.35 | +4.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.98 | 13.33 | +20.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXM.BR | EXA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 3.40 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.64 | 1.33 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.28 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXM.BR and EXA.PA is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Dividend Comparison
EXM.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.80%, while EXA.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXM.BR Exmar NV | 102.80% | 103.52% | 6.81% | 84.21% | 13.01% | 6.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.89% | 4.04% |
EXA.PA Exail Technologies | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 2.53% | 1.88% | 3.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXM.BR drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than EXA.PA's maximum drawdown of -85.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXM.BR and EXA.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXM.BR | EXA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -85.70% | -14.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -42.72% | +31.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.30% | -42.72% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.95% | -68.17% | -8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.79% | -11.96% | -85.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.06% | -36.33% | -35.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 20.33% | -16.76% |
Volatility
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Exmar NV (EXM.BR) is 16.08%, while Exail Technologies (EXA.PA) has a volatility of 27.14%. This indicates that EXM.BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXA.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXM.BR | EXA.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.08% | 27.14% | -11.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.92% | 44.71% | -23.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.13% | 67.74% | -7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.49% | 45.68% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.70% | 41.56% | +5.14% |
Financials
EXM.BR vs. EXA.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exmar NV and Exail Technologies. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities