EWBC vs. XLF
EWBC (East West Bancorp, Inc.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, EWBC returned 17.28%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for XLF. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
EWBC vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWBC achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EWBC has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 17.28%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.69% annualized return.
EWBC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 36.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- 17.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.41%
XLF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $112.82M | $115.30M | $117.41M | |
| $1.84B | $1.93B | $1.92B |
EWBC vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWBC East West Bancorp, Inc. | 18.13% | 20.31% | 36.76% | 12.75% | -14.44% | 57.98% | 7.23% | 14.34% | -27.44% | 21.38% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.86% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWBC and XLF is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 1999 | 0.63 |
The correlation between EWBC and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWBC vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
EWBC
XLF
EWBC vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWBC | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 0.71 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 1.80 | +4.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWBC vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWBC drawdown since its inception was -92.14%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWBC and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWBC | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.14% | -82.69% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -14.79% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.77% | -15.54% | -20.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.06% | -25.81% | -28.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.67% | -42.86% | -24.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -1.15% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.71% | -19.92% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 5.79% | -0.28% |
Volatility
EWBC vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.07%. This indicates that EWBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWBC | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 4.07% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 11.10% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.28% | 14.77% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.90% | 18.45% | +17.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.68% | 22.08% | +15.60% |
Dividends
EWBC vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
EWBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than XLF's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWBC East West Bancorp, Inc. | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.30% | 2.67% | 2.43% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 2.17% | 1.98% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.92% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.42% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWBC and XLF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWBC has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to XLF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWBC dropped -92.14% vs XLF's -82.69%.
EWBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWBC and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer