ETILX vs. TLLIX

In the year-to-date period, ETILX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than TLLIX's 13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ETILX has underperformed TLLIX with an annualized return of 7.11%, while TLLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ETILX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TLLIX's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ETILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the TLLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETILX and TLLIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ETILX nor TLLIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ETILX drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than TLLIX's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETILX and TLLIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Eventide Gilead Class I (ETILX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) at 3.92%. This indicates that ETILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.