ETG vs. FDGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX).
ETG is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 30, 2004. FDGFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 27, 1993.
Performance
ETG vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETG vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund | -11.37% | 36.92% | 15.46% | 21.97% | -27.62% | 33.08% | 10.08% | 43.62% | -15.90% | 33.55% |
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | -3.17% | 22.48% | 27.58% | 17.86% | -11.61% | 27.96% | 2.20% | 28.75% | -7.23% | 18.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETG achieves a -11.37% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's -3.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ETG having a 11.66% annualized return and FDGFX not far ahead at 12.06%.
ETG
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -11.37%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 18.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
FDGFX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETG vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETG has a 2.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETG vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank
ETG
FDGFX
ETG vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETG | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.91 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.88 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 8.47 | -3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETG | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.80 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.63 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETG and FDGFX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETG vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison
ETG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, less than FDGFX's 9.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund | 7.71% | 6.72% | 8.03% | 7.02% | 9.94% | 6.02% | 6.74% | 6.83% | 9.08% | 7.69% | 8.74% | 7.93% |
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund | 9.66% | 9.35% | 9.81% | 3.48% | 11.46% | 7.81% | 1.89% | 4.84% | 22.93% | 15.35% | 1.58% | 8.44% |
Drawdowns
ETG vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETG drawdown since its inception was -74.76%, which is greater than FDGFX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETG and FDGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETG | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.76% | -60.77% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.64% | -12.19% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.64% | -21.37% | -10.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.53% | -41.29% | -10.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.77% | -10.16% | -3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -7.56% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 2.70% | +1.11% |
Volatility
ETG vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) at 5.29%. This indicates that ETG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETG | FDGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 5.29% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 10.50% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 18.90% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 16.50% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.15% | 19.14% | +2.01% |