ESNT vs. MSFT
ESNT (Essent Group Ltd.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. ESNT operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ESNT returned 12.92%/yr vs 23.85%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESNT vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESNT achieves a -6.92% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -22.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ESNT has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 12.92%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.85% annualized return.
ESNT
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -6.92%
- 6M
- -8.05%
- 1Y
- 0.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -22.85%
- 1Y
- -22.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 23.85%
ESNT vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESNT Essent Group Ltd. | -6.92% | 21.95% | 5.23% | 38.60% | -12.76% | 7.06% | -15.53% | 53.00% | -21.28% | 34.14% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -22.33% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESNT and MSFT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2013 | 0.28 |
The correlation between ESNT and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESNT:
$5.65B
MSFT:
$2.78T
ESNT:
$6.98
MSFT:
$16.79
ESNT:
8.57
MSFT:
22.27
ESNT:
1.98
MSFT:
1.56
ESNT:
4.55
MSFT:
8.76
ESNT:
0.99
MSFT:
6.72
ESNT:
$1.29B
MSFT:
$318.27B
ESNT:
$839.13M
MSFT:
$217.41B
ESNT:
$643.27M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESNT vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
ESNT
MSFT
ESNT vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESNT | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.86 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | -0.66 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | -1.32 | +1.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESNT vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESNT drawdown since its inception was -64.72%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESNT and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESNT | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.72% | -69.38% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -33.91% | +18.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.36% | -33.91% | +15.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -37.15% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.72% | -37.15% | -27.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -30.58% | +21.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -21.79% | +8.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 17.08% | -9.47% |
Volatility
ESNT vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) is 6.46%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that ESNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESNT | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 11.34% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 22.94% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 26.02% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 26.79% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.69% | 27.09% | +11.60% |
Dividends
ESNT vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
ESNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than MSFT's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESNT Essent Group Ltd. | 2.21% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 1.90% | 2.21% | 1.54% | 1.48% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.95% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
ESNT vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Essent Group Ltd. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESNT vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
ESNT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essent Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 336.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
ESNT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essent Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 336.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
ESNT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essent Group Ltd. reported a net income of 171.80M and revenue of 336.07M, resulting in a net margin of 51.1%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESNT and MSFT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to ESNT (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESNT dropped -64.72% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
ESNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESNT and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer