PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIGX vs. EMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund (ESIGX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIGX achieves a 30.57% return, which is significantly lower than EMFIX's 32.65% return.


ESIGX

1D
2.37%
1M
6.22%
YTD
30.57%
6M
33.26%
1Y
61.31%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*

EMFIX

1D
2.34%
1M
5.60%
YTD
32.65%
6M
35.12%
1Y
62.00%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
14.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIGX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund
30.57%34.35%7.96%10.61%-27.17%-1.02%45.70%
EMFIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund
32.65%35.16%7.08%9.68%-26.09%4.05%37.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIGX and EMFIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2020

0.97

The correlation between ESIGX and EMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIGX vs. EMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIGX
ESIGX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EMFIX
EMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund (ESIGX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESIGXEMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.55

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

4.64

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

16.77

+0.10

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the EMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIGX and EMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIGX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EMFIX drawdown of -44.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIGX and EMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIGXEMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.21%

-44.99%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-13.20%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-19.91%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.76%

-42.41%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-16.89%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.65%

-0.08%

Volatility

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund (ESIGX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) have volatilities of 9.18% and 9.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIGXEMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

9.45%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

17.36%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.47%

19.98%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

19.29%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

19.81%

+2.07%

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESIGX and EMFIX have an expense ratio of 1.17%.


Dividends

ESIGX vs. EMFIX - Dividend Comparison

ESIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than EMFIX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMFIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.23%1.65%0.61%1.25%0.82%22.32%2.32%2.16%0.82%2.12%1.00%
ESIGX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund
1.33%2.04%0.51%0.78%0.00%16.52%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, ESIGX and EMFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMFIX has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to ESIGX (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESIGX dropped -47.21% vs EMFIX's -44.99%.

ESIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIGX and EMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer