PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIC.L
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-15.90%7.11%-1.15%12.93%-11.01%14.25%5.78%
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
-7.18%-1.95%35.07%37.43%-32.18%23.87%5.27%
Different Trading Currencies

ESIC.L is traded in GBP, while XSCD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSCD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIC.L achieves a -15.90% return, which is significantly lower than XSCD.L's -7.18% return.


ESIC.L

1D
2.76%
1M
-6.45%
YTD
-15.90%
6M
-12.32%
1Y
-7.62%
3Y*
-5.01%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*

XSCD.L

1D
1.81%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-7.18%
6M
-6.01%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIC.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XSCD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIC.L
ESIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XSCD.L
XSCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIC.LXSCD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

0.80

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.44

1.30

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.16

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

0.50

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.07

1.17

-2.23

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIC.L and XSCD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIC.LXSCD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.80

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.39

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.73

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between ESIC.L and XSCD.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Dividend Comparison

ESIC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ESIC.L
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.49%0.44%0.40%0.60%0.88%0.36%0.58%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.93%, smaller than the maximum XSCD.L drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIC.L and XSCD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIC.LXSCD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.93%

-34.70%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.82%

-13.94%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.93%

-34.70%

+5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.68%

-12.58%

-7.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-12.13%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.10%

11.94%

-4.84%

Volatility

ESIC.L vs. XSCD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESIC.LXSCD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

6.43%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

15.81%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

26.89%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

26.93%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.22%

30.29%

-10.07%