ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and BMO S&P 500 (CAD Hedged) (ZUE.TO).
ESG.TO and ZUE.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESG.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2020. ZUE.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 29, 2009. Both ESG.TO and ZUE.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | -3.46% | 10.99% | 33.33% | 25.19% | -14.05% | 32.71% | 19.30% |
ZUE.TO BMO S&P 500 (CAD Hedged) | -4.96% | 15.57% | 23.40% | 24.35% | -19.43% | 27.86% | 23.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG.TO achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly higher than ZUE.TO's -4.96% return.
ESG.TO
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- 14.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ZUE.TO
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -2.91%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESG.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZUE.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESG.TO
ZUE.TO
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and BMO S&P 500 (CAD Hedged) (ZUE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESG.TO | ZUE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.34 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 6.15 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESG.TO | ZUE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.61 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.77 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG.TO and ZUE.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ZUE.TO's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF | 0.87% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZUE.TO BMO S&P 500 (CAD Hedged) | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.02% | 1.33% | 1.50% | 1.13% | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 1.67% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum ZUE.TO drawdown of -35.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG.TO and ZUE.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG.TO | ZUE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.31% | -35.56% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -11.95% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.31% | -25.34% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.93% | -6.72% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -4.12% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.60% | +0.97% |
Volatility
ESG.TO vs. ZUE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and BMO S&P 500 (CAD Hedged) (ZUE.TO) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESG.TO | ZUE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.44% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 9.50% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 18.08% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 16.86% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 18.12% | -1.67% |