EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L).
EQQS.L and X7PP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQQS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ - 100 Notional NTR Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2021. X7PP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Jul 7, 2009. Both EQQS.L and X7PP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQS.L Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | -5.48% | 19.85% | 26.77% | 55.63% | -33.47% | 19.57% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | -6.30% | 101.94% | 24.95% | 29.78% | -5.30% | 9.32% |
Different Trading Currencies
EQQS.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQQS.L achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's -6.30% return.
EQQS.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -5.48%
- 6M
- -3.18%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
X7PP.L
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 43.06%
- 3Y*
- 41.97%
- 5Y*
- 26.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EQQS.L and X7PP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQQS.L
X7PP.L
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.64 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 2.10 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.70 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 9.51 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.64 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.26 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQS.L and X7PP.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQQS.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQS.L and X7PP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -56.28% | +21.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -15.94% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -10.94% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -15.54% | +6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 4.38% | -1.39% |
Volatility
EQQS.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) is 5.66%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that EQQS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQQS.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 9.84% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 17.90% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 26.06% | -6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 26.14% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 27.42% | -4.80% |