PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF (WUTI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EQQS.L
Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
-5.09%19.85%26.77%55.63%-33.47%19.57%
WUTI.L
SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF
9.42%25.37%13.26%0.13%-3.55%6.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQS.L achieves a -5.09% return, which is significantly lower than WUTI.L's 9.42% return.


EQQS.L

1D
3.38%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
-5.09%
6M
-2.18%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
10Y*

WUTI.L

1D
1.45%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
9.42%
6M
11.39%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WUTI.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQS.L
EQQS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

WUTI.L
WUTI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WUTI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WUTI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) and SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF (WUTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQS.LWUTI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.80

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

2.37

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.79

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.86

12.20

-4.34

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the WUTI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQS.L and WUTI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQS.LWUTI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.80

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between EQQS.L and WUTI.L is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQQS.L nor WUTI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, roughly equal to the maximum WUTI.L drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQS.L and WUTI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQS.LWUTI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-33.85%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.93%

-9.68%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-2.90%

-4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-5.00%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.22%

+0.84%

Volatility

EQQS.L vs. WUTI.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to SPDR MSCI World Utilits UCITS ETF (WUTI.L) at 5.14%. This indicates that EQQS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WUTI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQQS.LWUTI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

5.14%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

9.16%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

15.29%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.63%

14.96%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.63%

15.60%

+7.03%