PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQLI.TO achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than HDIV.TO's 3.20% return.


EQLI.TO

1D
1.76%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.84%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDIV.TO

1D
1.91%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
3.20%
6M
9.39%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQLI.TO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HDIV.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQLI.TO
EQLI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQLI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HDIV.TO
HDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLI.TOHDIV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

2.05

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

2.59

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.45

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.61

-1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.19

12.70

-9.52

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQLI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQLI.TO and HDIV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLI.TOHDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

2.05

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.11

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between EQLI.TO and HDIV.TO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than HDIV.TO's 9.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
EQLI.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
8.67%8.74%3.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF
9.23%10.09%11.38%10.41%9.64%3.39%

Drawdowns

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQLI.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.57%, smaller than the maximum HDIV.TO drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQLI.TO and HDIV.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLI.TOHDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-22.32%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-13.77%

+1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-5.09%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-4.35%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.83%

+0.22%

Volatility

EQLI.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (EQLI.TO) is 3.72%, while Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that EQLI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQLI.TOHDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

6.01%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

10.54%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

16.89%

-3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

15.73%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

15.73%

-3.23%