PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCL.TO achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than HTAE.TO's -9.31% return.


EQCL.TO

1D
0.31%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
0.58%
6M
3.37%
1Y
18.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HTAE.TO

1D
1.84%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
-9.31%
6M
-8.48%
1Y
17.01%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQCL.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAE.TO's 2.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCL.TO
EQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HTAE.TO
HTAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQCL.TOHTAE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.57

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.02

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.14

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.98

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.69

3.03

+2.66

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the HTAE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCL.TO and HTAE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQCL.TOHTAE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.57

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.92

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between EQCL.TO and HTAE.TO is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.86%, less than HTAE.TO's 13.16% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
EQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD
11.86%11.51%10.96%2.87%0.00%
HTAE.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units
13.16%11.28%10.01%9.38%2.20%

Drawdowns

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum HTAE.TO drawdown of -30.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCL.TO and HTAE.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQCL.TOHTAE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-30.83%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-18.39%

+3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-13.18%

+8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-4.68%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

5.92%

-2.80%

Volatility

EQCL.TO vs. HTAE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) is 7.37%, while Harvest Tech Achievers Enhanced Income ETF - Class A Units (HTAE.TO) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that EQCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTAE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQCL.TOHTAE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

8.53%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

17.26%

-6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

29.98%

-10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

27.06%

-11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

27.06%

-11.94%