EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP.TO).

EQCL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 10, 2023.

Performance

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EQCL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD	-0.76%	16.95%	24.04%	3.94%
FAP.TO abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	-5.53%	9.74%	19.14%	4.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQCL.TO achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly higher than FAP.TO's -5.53% return.

EQCL.TO

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -5.23%
• YTD: -0.76%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAP.TO

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: -5.53%
• 6M: -6.05%
• 1Y: -2.16%
• 3Y*: 9.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQCL.TO

EQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FAP.TO

FAP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 28
FAP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FAP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FAP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FAP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FAP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) and abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQCL.TO	FAP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	-0.20	+1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	-0.21	+1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.97	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	-0.29	+1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	-0.79	+6.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the FAP.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQCL.TO and FAP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQCL.TO	FAP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	-0.20	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between EQCL.TO and FAP.TO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than FAP.TO's 8.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQCL.TO Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD	10.88%	11.51%	10.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FAP.TO abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC	8.18%	7.65%	8.57%	8.56%	139.22%	9.02%	8.44%	8.88%	10.78%	8.68%	9.89%	10.93%

Drawdowns

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum FAP.TO drawdown of -721.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCL.TO and FAP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQCL.TO	FAP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-721.54%	+702.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.29%	-7.41%	-7.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-772.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-766.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-677.98%	+672.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-68.26%	+66.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.74%	+0.37%

Volatility

EQCL.TO vs. FAP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF CAD (EQCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund VCC (FAP.TO) at 2.95%. This indicates that EQCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQCL.TO	FAP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	2.95%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	6.11%	+4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.48%	10.91%	+8.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	281.56%	-266.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	199.31%	-184.26%