EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO).
EQCC.TO and HSAV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 28, 2024. HSAV.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020.
Performance
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF | -0.75% | 13.50% | 11.68% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 1.13% | 2.58% | 2.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQCC.TO achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.13% return.
EQCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EQCC.TO
HSAV.TO
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQCC.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 2.28 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 3.43 | -2.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.44 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 5.23 | -4.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 14.33 | -10.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQCC.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.28 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.77 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQCC.TO and HSAV.TO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
EQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EQCC.TO Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF | 8.84% | 9.43% | 5.38% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQCC.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQCC.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -2.18% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -0.59% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | 0.00% | -5.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -0.19% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 0.22% | +2.67% |
Volatility
EQCC.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF (EQCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.49%. This indicates that EQCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQCC.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 0.49% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 0.96% | +6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 1.37% | +14.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 1.75% | +11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 1.58% | +12.05% |