PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPOL vs. EMXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE).

EPOL and EMXC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EPOL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Poland Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 25, 2010. EMXC.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. Both EPOL and EMXC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF		3.67%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-7.58%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc		9.56%35.38%2.89%17.94%-18.36%8.29%12.27%5.64%
Different Trading Currencies

EPOL is traded in USD, while EMXC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMXC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.DE's 9.56% return.

EPOL

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
3.67%
6M
15.67%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
39.15%
5Y*
18.51%
10Y*
9.04%

EMXC.DE

1D
4.57%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
9.56%
6M
18.76%
1Y
47.95%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Poland ETF

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc

Often compared with EPOL:
EPOL vs. SPYEPOL vs. EWQEPOL vs. IBCJ.DEEPOL vs. EIRLEPOL vs. EWPEPOL vs. EWKEPOL vs. EWW
Often compared with EMXC.DE:
EMXC.DE vs. EIMI.LEMXC.DE vs. SMHEMXC.DE vs. EMXCEMXC.DE vs. IYWEMXC.DE vs. GLDEMXC.DE vs. PAVEEMXC.DE vs. IVV

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.

EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc

Return for Risk

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EPOLEMXC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

2.27

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

2.96

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.41

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.67

13.63

-4.96

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and EMXC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EPOLEMXC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

2.27

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.50

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.50

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and EMXC.DE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while EMXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF		4.61%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than EMXC.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and EMXC.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

EPOLEMXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-38.77%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-12.87%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-20.48%

-33.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-8.18%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.16%

-6.86%

-20.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

3.11%

+1.16%

Volatility

EPOL vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) have volatilities of 9.41% and 9.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

EPOLEMXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

9.28%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

15.36%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.76%

21.04%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.00%

17.07%

+11.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

19.59%

+8.08%