ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO).
ENCC.TO and HPYT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011. HPYT.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on May 30, 2024.
Performance
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 19.85% | 13.13% | 17.39% | -2.82% |
HPYT.TO Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A | -0.23% | 4.39% | -5.96% | 4.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENCC.TO achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than HPYT.TO's -0.23% return.
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 27.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 26.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
HPYT.TO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- -1.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENCC.TO has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than HPYT.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ENCC.TO
HPYT.TO
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENCC.TO | HPYT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | -0.12 | +1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | -0.09 | +2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.99 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | -0.03 | +1.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | -0.06 | +6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENCC.TO | HPYT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | -0.12 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.08 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENCC.TO and HPYT.TO is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ENCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, less than HPYT.TO's 18.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 11.72% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.09% | 8.35% | 6.92% | 4.77% | 15.15% |
HPYT.TO Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A | 18.19% | 18.87% | 18.61% | 3.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than HPYT.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCC.TO and HPYT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENCC.TO | HPYT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -13.17% | -76.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.61% | -7.76% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -7.27% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.24% | -5.76% | -34.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 3.43% | +0.70% |
Volatility
ENCC.TO vs. HPYT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Harvest Premium Yield Treasury ETF A (HPYT.TO) at 3.34%. This indicates that ENCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENCC.TO | HPYT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 3.34% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 5.59% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.49% | 9.53% | +7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 11.05% | +12.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 11.05% | +18.00% |