PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EMR vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMR vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.82%
20.69%
EMR
XLF

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 35.14% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 33.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EMR has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 10.06%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.


EMR

YTD

35.14%

1M

17.41%

6M

13.61%

1Y

48.46%

5Y (annualized)

14.57%

10Y (annualized)

10.06%

XLF

YTD

33.26%

1M

4.87%

6M

19.02%

1Y

43.33%

5Y (annualized)

12.87%

10Y (annualized)

11.83%

Key characteristics


EMRXLF
Sharpe Ratio1.853.14
Sortino Ratio2.814.45
Omega Ratio1.391.57
Calmar Ratio2.843.54
Martin Ratio7.8422.40
Ulcer Index6.14%1.93%
Daily Std Dev26.03%13.77%
Max Drawdown-56.14%-82.69%
Current Drawdown-0.41%-0.96%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between EMR and XLF is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMR vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMR, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.853.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMR, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.814.45
The chart of Omega ratio for EMR, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.391.57
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMR, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.843.54
The chart of Martin ratio for EMR, currently valued at 7.84, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.8422.40
EMR
XLF

The current EMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMR and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.85
3.14
EMR
XLF

Dividends

EMR vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than XLF's 1.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.63%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%2.85%2.37%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.34%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%1.95%1.61%1.47%

Drawdowns

EMR vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -56.14%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.41%
-0.96%
EMR
XLF

Volatility

EMR vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 7.02%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.49%
7.02%
EMR
XLF