EMR vs. XLF
EMR (Emerson Electric Co.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, EMR returned 13.44%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for XLF. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EMR vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -2.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EMR having a 13.44% annualized return and XLF not far behind at 13.33%.
EMR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 15.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
XLF
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
EMR vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 8.65% | 8.92% | 29.73% | 3.75% | 5.74% | 18.19% | 8.61% | 31.53% | -11.87% | 29.05% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -2.11% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMR and XLF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.60 |
The correlation between EMR and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMR vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
EMR
XLF
EMR vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 1.08 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMR vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -82.69% | +23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.45% | -14.79% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.62% | -15.54% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -25.81% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.77% | -42.86% | -7.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | -4.94% | -5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -20.01% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.79% | 5.76% | +5.03% |
Volatility
EMR vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.23%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 4.23% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 11.26% | +13.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.47% | 14.69% | +15.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.36% | 18.66% | +8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 22.17% | +6.97% |
Dividends
EMR vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than XLF's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.53% | 1.61% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.49% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMR and XLF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMR has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMR dropped -59.05% vs XLF's -82.69%.
EMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMR and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer