PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) and iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF (IS3H.DE).

ELF1.DE and IS3H.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ELF1.DE is a passively managed fund by Deka that tracks the performance of the MDAX®. It was launched on Apr 11, 2014. IS3H.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU Mid Cap. It was launched on Sep 13, 2013. Both ELF1.DE and IS3H.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) and iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF (IS3H.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELF1.DE
Deka MDAX UCITS ETF		-5.63%19.01%-5.82%7.32%-28.88%13.39%8.33%30.58%-17.98%17.52%
IS3H.DE
iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF		3.90%30.84%11.73%8.69%-14.80%15.42%3.89%29.25%-15.98%19.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELF1.DE achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than IS3H.DE's 3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ELF1.DE has underperformed IS3H.DE with an annualized return of 3.15%, while IS3H.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.

ELF1.DE

1D
-1.06%
1M
-3.02%
YTD
-5.63%
6M
-6.09%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
1.30%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
3.15%

IS3H.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.90%
6M
6.89%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Deka MDAX UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF

Often compared with ELF1.DE:
ELF1.DE vs. ^GDAXIELF1.DE vs. EL4A.DEELF1.DE vs. D6RP.DEELF1.DE vs. ELFF.DEELF1.DE vs. EL4F.DEELF1.DE vs. EL4G.DEELF1.DE vs. AMES.DE
Often compared with IS3H.DE:
IS3H.DE vs. CEMR.DEIS3H.DE vs. XESC.DEIS3H.DE vs. GLDIS3H.DE vs. EL42.DEIS3H.DE vs. SXRD.DEIS3H.DE vs. B41J.DEIS3H.DE vs. EL4G.DE

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELF1.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3H.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.

IS3H.DE
iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF
ELF1.DE
Deka MDAX UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ELF1.DE
ELF1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ELF1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELF1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
IS3H.DE
IS3H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IS3H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) and iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF (IS3H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ELF1.DEIS3H.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

1.55

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

2.07

-1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.31

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

3.13

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.40

11.55

-10.15

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELF1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the IS3H.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELF1.DE and IS3H.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ELF1.DEIS3H.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.55

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.59

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.57

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.54

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between ELF1.DE and IS3H.DE is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELF1.DE nor IS3H.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELF1.DE
Deka MDAX UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.48%0.46%0.44%0.41%
IS3H.DE
iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELF1.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than IS3H.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELF1.DE and IS3H.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ELF1.DEIS3H.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-37.63%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-9.04%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.27%

-26.54%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.27%

-37.63%

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.97%

-3.47%

-18.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-6.41%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

2.20%

+2.85%

Volatility

ELF1.DE vs. IS3H.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MDAX UCITS ETF (ELF1.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to iShares MSCI EMU Mid Cap UCITS ETF (IS3H.DE) at 5.77%. This indicates that ELF1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3H.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ELF1.DEIS3H.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

5.77%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

9.04%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

15.00%

+4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

15.24%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

16.12%

+2.02%