EIVPX vs. EISMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX).
EIVPX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Feb 8, 2017. EISMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 0.18% | 12.90% | 16.45% | 16.83% | -8.64% | 17.96% | 4.74% | 15.46% | -2.80% | 8.71% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | -4.37% | -5.66% | 17.64% | 14.01% | -8.77% | 22.02% | 11.31% | 34.37% | -5.55% | 19.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIVPX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -4.37% return.
EIVPX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 17.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- —
EISMX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- -2.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIVPX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIVPX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIVPX
EISMX
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIVPX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | -0.37 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | -0.43 | +2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.95 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | -0.40 | +2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.62 | -0.90 | +11.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIVPX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | -0.37 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.24 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.53 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIVPX and EISMX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison
EIVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than EISMX's 6.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIVPX Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund | 4.01% | 4.01% | 2.67% | 5.09% | 7.95% | 1.22% | 0.75% | 1.23% | 1.24% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | 6.72% | 6.43% | 7.26% | 2.78% | 10.37% | 10.49% | 9.80% | 6.52% | 7.20% | 3.30% | 3.58% | 6.70% |
Drawdowns
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIVPX drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIVPX and EISMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIVPX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.67% | -45.32% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -14.66% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | -19.81% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -14.99% | +13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -5.78% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 6.52% | -5.14% |
Volatility
EIVPX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parametric Volatility Risk Premium - Defensive Fund (EIVPX) is 3.16%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that EIVPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIVPX | EISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 4.88% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.57% | 11.31% | -5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 18.95% | -7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 17.08% | -7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 18.82% | -6.92% |