EGRAX vs. CGFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A (EGRAX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX).
EGRAX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 28, 2012. CGFIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Oct 31, 1990.
Performance
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRAX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A | 3.57% | 20.06% | 9.19% | 8.10% | -2.30% | 3.35% | 4.49% | 14.43% | -8.66% | 5.49% |
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund | -0.35% | 5.79% | 4.85% | -2.54% | -9.99% | 1.39% | 6.37% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 1.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGRAX achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than CGFIX's -0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EGRAX has outperformed CGFIX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while CGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
EGRAX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
CGFIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGRAX has a 2.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CGFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EGRAX vs. CGFIX — Risk / Return Rank
EGRAX
CGFIX
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A (EGRAX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGRAX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.97 | 1.48 | +3.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.72 | 2.04 | +4.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.31 | 1.29 | +1.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.07 | 1.93 | +4.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.97 | 8.06 | +16.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGRAX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97 | 1.48 | +3.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.09 | -0.01 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.54 | 0.40 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.89 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between EGRAX and CGFIX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Dividend Comparison
EGRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than CGFIX's 6.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGRAX Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A | 6.52% | 6.76% | 5.86% | 3.18% | 4.53% | 4.58% | 5.61% | 4.02% | 0.00% | 2.82% | 1.47% | 6.42% |
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund | 6.14% | 5.51% | 6.43% | 2.08% | 0.00% | 7.49% | 0.23% | 3.29% | 6.05% | 0.33% | 1.12% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGRAX drawdown since its inception was -14.15%, smaller than the maximum CGFIX drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGRAX and CGFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGRAX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.15% | -20.28% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -2.78% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.31% | -20.28% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.15% | -20.28% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -3.32% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -3.20% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.67% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EGRAX vs. CGFIX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class A (EGRAX) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) at 1.50%. This indicates that EGRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EGRAX | CGFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 1.50% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | 2.12% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 3.48% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 5.76% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 4.74% | -0.80% |