EFZ vs. YQQQ
EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) and YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%), while YQQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. EFZ is passively managed, while YQQQ is actively managed. Over the past year, EFZ returned -13.80% vs -7.93% for YQQQ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for YQQQ.
Performance
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFZ achieves a -7.54% return, which is significantly lower than YQQQ's -5.25% return.
EFZ
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -7.54%
- 1Y
- -13.80%
- 3Y*
- -9.08%
- 5Y*
- -5.66%
- 10Y*
- -8.31%
YQQQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 1Y
- -7.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -7.54% | -20.92% | 5.31% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | -5.25% | -9.97% | -5.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFZ and YQQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between EFZ and YQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFZ vs. YQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EFZ
YQQQ
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.92 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.37 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -0.85 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFZ drawdown since its inception was -88.15%, which is greater than YQQQ's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFZ and YQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.15% | -29.10% | -59.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.60% | -21.80% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.89% | -25.26% | -62.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.18% | -14.89% | -52.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.71% | 9.31% | +1.40% |
Volatility
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is 4.97%, while YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that EFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFZ | YQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 6.42% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 11.66% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 13.92% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 16.58% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 16.58% | +0.53% |
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFZ vs. YQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than YQQQ's 29.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 3.96% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF | 29.17% | 31.71% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFZ and YQQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YQQQ has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to EFZ (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFZ dropped -88.15% vs YQQQ's -29.10%.
On 1-year performance, YQQQ leads with -7.93% vs -13.80% for EFZ. On fees, EFZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YQQQ has performed better with a -7.93% return vs -13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YQQQ.
YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 29.17%, compared with 3.96% for EFZ.
EFZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YQQQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFZ and 0.99% for YQQQ.
YQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFZ and YQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer