EFT vs. ARCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFT or ARCC.
Correlation
The correlation between EFT and ARCC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EFT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFT:
1.49
ARCC:
2.12
EFT:
2.05
ARCC:
2.91
EFT:
1.29
ARCC:
1.38
EFT:
2.47
ARCC:
3.61
EFT:
8.92
ARCC:
14.94
EFT:
1.58%
ARCC:
1.68%
EFT:
9.43%
ARCC:
11.88%
EFT:
-60.58%
ARCC:
-79.36%
EFT:
-0.44%
ARCC:
-0.51%
Fundamentals
EFT:
$352.49M
ARCC:
$15.63B
EFT:
$2.02
ARCC:
$2.60
EFT:
6.66
ARCC:
8.96
EFT:
0.00
ARCC:
3.95
EFT:
$27.79M
ARCC:
$2.01B
EFT:
$27.79M
ARCC:
$1.85B
EFT:
-$1.81M
ARCC:
$703.00M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 7.48%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.
EFT
5.14%
5.14%
5.31%
12.53%
8.16%
7.48%
ARCC
6.99%
6.99%
17.66%
26.88%
15.07%
13.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFT vs. ARCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFT
ARCC
EFT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, more than ARCC's 8.20% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 10.01% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.85% | 5.26% | 5.88% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.73% | 6.03% | 7.17% | 6.36% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 8.20% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% | 10.06% |
Drawdowns
EFT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and ARCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.66%. This indicates that EFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EFT vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities