PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EFT vs. ARCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

EFT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.58%
8.03%
EFT
ARCC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a 15.85% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's 17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 6.79%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.


EFT

YTD

15.85%

1M

3.01%

6M

4.58%

1Y

23.02%

5Y (annualized)

8.85%

10Y (annualized)

6.79%

ARCC

YTD

17.87%

1M

2.42%

6M

8.03%

1Y

21.89%

5Y (annualized)

13.92%

10Y (annualized)

13.32%

Fundamentals


EFTARCC
Market Cap$351.45M$14.07B
EPS$2.02$2.60
PE Ratio6.648.38
PEG Ratio0.003.95
Total Revenue (TTM)$44.13M$2.46B
Gross Profit (TTM)$41.80M$2.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$36.86M$897.00M

Key characteristics


EFTARCC
Sharpe Ratio2.291.92
Sortino Ratio3.252.69
Omega Ratio1.461.35
Calmar Ratio3.583.15
Martin Ratio14.8913.34
Ulcer Index1.55%1.64%
Daily Std Dev10.04%11.42%
Max Drawdown-60.58%-79.36%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between EFT and ARCC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EFT, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.291.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for EFT, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.252.69
The chart of Omega ratio for EFT, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.461.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for EFT, currently valued at 3.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.583.15
The chart of Martin ratio for EFT, currently valued at 14.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.8913.34
EFT
ARCC

The current EFT Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFT and ARCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.29
1.92
EFT
ARCC

Dividends

EFT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, more than ARCC's 8.72% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
10.64%11.09%9.14%5.26%5.40%7.41%6.77%5.26%5.54%7.17%5.82%6.62%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
8.72%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%10.06%8.84%

Drawdowns

EFT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and ARCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
EFT
ARCC

Volatility

EFT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) is 2.12%, while Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that EFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.12%
3.34%
EFT
ARCC

Financials

EFT vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items