EFT vs. ARCC
EFT (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, EFT returned 5.54%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 5.54%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.
EFT
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- -4.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
ARCC
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -5.60%
- 1Y
- -8.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
EFT vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | -2.28% | -3.77% | 13.17% | 27.14% | -19.69% | 21.00% | 2.41% | 16.85% | -6.14% | 1.63% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -7.09% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFT and ARCC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
EFT:
$283.59M
ARCC:
$12.81B
EFT:
$0.85
ARCC:
$1.63
EFT:
12.56
ARCC:
10.94
EFT:
0.09
ARCC:
1.64
EFT:
4.71
ARCC:
4.78
EFT:
0.85
ARCC:
0.91
EFT:
$60.18M
ARCC:
$2.63B
EFT:
$36.55M
ARCC:
$1.86B
EFT:
$24.44M
ARCC:
$2.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFT vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
EFT
ARCC
EFT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFT | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.44 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | -0.79 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFT | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.58% | -79.36% | +18.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -19.35% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -19.35% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.98% | -21.76% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.51% | -56.77% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.96% | -15.44% | +4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -9.11% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 10.85% | -4.17% |
Volatility
EFT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) is 1.14%, while Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that EFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFT | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 4.64% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.49% | 15.11% | -7.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.33% | 18.68% | -9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 19.95% | -7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 25.60% | -9.84% |
Dividends
EFT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, less than ARCC's 10.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.76% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 9.12% | 9.55% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.81% | 5.24% | 5.88% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.73% | 5.54% | 6.57% |
Financials
EFT vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFT vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
EFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
EFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported an operating income of 13.37M and revenue of 13.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 95.7%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.
EFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a net income of 7.76M and revenue of 13.97M, resulting in a net margin of 55.6%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFT and ARCC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARCC has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to EFT (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFT dropped -60.58% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
ARCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFT and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer