PortfoliosLab logo
EFT vs. ARCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EFT and ARCC is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EFT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EFT:

-0.00

ARCC:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

EFT:

0.01

ARCC:

1.05

Omega Ratio

EFT:

1.00

ARCC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

EFT:

-0.05

ARCC:

0.74

Martin Ratio

EFT:

-0.21

ARCC:

2.95

Ulcer Index

EFT:

4.25%

ARCC:

4.68%

Daily Std Dev

EFT:

14.21%

ARCC:

20.67%

Max Drawdown

EFT:

-60.58%

ARCC:

-79.40%

Current Drawdown

EFT:

-8.00%

ARCC:

-7.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFT:

$319.19M

ARCC:

$14.52B

EPS

EFT:

$1.44

ARCC:

$2.04

PE Ratio

EFT:

8.38

ARCC:

10.32

PEG Ratio

EFT:

0.00

ARCC:

3.95

PS Ratio

EFT:

5.93

ARCC:

4.81

PB Ratio

EFT:

0.91

ARCC:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFT:

$39.96M

ARCC:

$2.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFT:

$39.96M

ARCC:

$2.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

EFT:

-$902.57K

ARCC:

$1.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFT achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly lower than ARCC's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EFT has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 5.79%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.05% annualized return.


EFT

YTD

-2.83%

1M

5.03%

6M

-3.92%

1Y

-0.02%

5Y*

11.43%

10Y*

5.79%

ARCC

YTD

0.89%

1M

8.44%

6M

4.56%

1Y

12.06%

5Y*

22.01%

10Y*

13.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFT vs. ARCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFT is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFT is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFT is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFT is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFT is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFT is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARCC is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARCC is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARCC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFT and ARCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EFT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

EFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than ARCC's 8.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFT
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
10.48%10.52%11.09%9.10%5.24%5.40%7.41%6.77%5.26%5.54%7.17%5.82%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
8.89%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%10.06%

Drawdowns

EFT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFT drawdown since its inception was -60.58%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFT and ARCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EFT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) is 3.33%, while Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that EFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EFT vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
13.03M
599.00M
(EFT) Total Revenue
(ARCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EFT vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust and Ares Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
84.3%
(EFT) Gross Margin
(ARCC) Gross Margin
EFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a gross profit of 13.03M and revenue of 13.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ARCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 505.00M and revenue of 599.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.3%.

EFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported an operating income of 11.85M and revenue of 13.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.

ARCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 434.00M and revenue of 599.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 72.5%.

EFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a net income of 7.32M and revenue of 13.03M, resulting in a net margin of 56.2%.

ARCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 365.00M and revenue of 599.00M, resulting in a net margin of 60.9%.