PortfoliosLab logo
EEMA vs. VTI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EEMA and VTI is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EEMA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EEMA:

0.41

VTI:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

EEMA:

0.88

VTI:

1.11

Omega Ratio

EEMA:

1.11

VTI:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

EEMA:

0.37

VTI:

0.73

Martin Ratio

EEMA:

1.47

VTI:

2.76

Ulcer Index

EEMA:

7.50%

VTI:

5.10%

Daily Std Dev

EEMA:

22.10%

VTI:

20.25%

Max Drawdown

EEMA:

-44.18%

VTI:

-55.45%

Current Drawdown

EEMA:

-14.96%

VTI:

-3.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMA achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMA has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 3.97%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.


EEMA

YTD

9.27%

1M

10.49%

6M

8.32%

1Y

9.06%

5Y*

7.18%

10Y*

3.97%

VTI

YTD

0.62%

1M

10.20%

6M

-0.51%

1Y

12.13%

5Y*

16.89%

10Y*

12.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEMA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EEMA vs. VTI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMA is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMA is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMA is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMA is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMA is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMA is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VTI is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VTI is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VTI is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VTI is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VTI is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VTI is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EEMA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EEMA Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMA and VTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EEMA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VTI's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EEMA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
1.59%1.74%2.25%1.78%2.19%1.15%1.86%2.17%1.73%1.74%2.44%1.33%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.29%1.27%1.44%1.67%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%1.76%

Drawdowns

EEMA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EEMA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) is 5.41%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that EEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...