PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBNK.TO achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than UTES.TO's 10.78% return.


EBNK.TO

1D
2.78%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
10Y*

UTES.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.27%
YTD
10.78%
6M
10.24%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EBNK.TO and UTES.TO have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBNK.TO
EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBNK.TOUTES.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

2.13

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

2.80

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.72

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.34

11.31

-3.96

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBNK.TO and UTES.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EBNK.TOUTES.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.13

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.44

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between EBNK.TO and UTES.TO is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Dividend Comparison

EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.47%, less than UTES.TO's 17.25% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
EBNK.TO
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD
11.47%11.05%12.56%7.32%7.52%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
17.25%18.30%6.05%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than UTES.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNK.TO and UTES.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EBNK.TOUTES.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-10.19%

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-8.29%

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.81%

-1.25%

-6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-2.63%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

1.99%

+2.27%

Volatility

EBNK.TO vs. UTES.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that EBNK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EBNK.TOUTES.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

2.81%

+6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.29%

6.67%

+8.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.15%

10.82%

+18.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.06%

10.99%

+16.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

10.99%

+16.07%