EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO).
EBNK.TO and HXF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBNK.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Jan 7, 2022. HXF.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return). It was launched on Sep 16, 2013.
Performance
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD | -0.96% | 60.13% | 28.78% | 20.83% | -4.75% |
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | -1.45% | 35.34% | 30.20% | 12.45% | -12.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBNK.TO achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly higher than HXF.TO's -1.45% return.
EBNK.TO
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HXF.TO
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 36.39%
- 3Y*
- 24.60%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBNK.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HXF.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EBNK.TO
HXF.TO
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBNK.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 2.44 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 3.28 | -1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.53 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.59 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 14.97 | -7.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBNK.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 2.44 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.76 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between EBNK.TO and HXF.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.47%, while HXF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD | 11.47% | 11.05% | 12.56% | 7.32% | 7.52% |
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum HXF.TO drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBNK.TO and HXF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBNK.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -39.77% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.39% | -10.13% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.81% | -3.93% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -5.14% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 2.43% | +1.83% |
Volatility
EBNK.TO vs. HXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) at 6.92%. This indicates that EBNK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EBNK.TO | HXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 6.92% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 10.22% | +5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.15% | 14.98% | +14.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 14.26% | +12.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 16.90% | +10.16% |