PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAPR vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EAPR vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EAPR vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAPR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's -0.37% return.


EAPR

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.49%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
1.76%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAPR vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAPR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EAPR vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAPR vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAPRDMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

2.26

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

3.38

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.99

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.21

19.40

-6.19

EAPR vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAPR and DMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAPRDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.26

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.68

-1.32

Correlation

The correlation between EAPR and DMAX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EAPR vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


Drawdowns

EAPR vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPR and DMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EAPRDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-3.37%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-2.00%

-4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.97%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-0.42%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.41%

+0.53%

Volatility

EAPR vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.98%. This indicates that EAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EAPRDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.98%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

1.81%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.73%

3.46%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

3.57%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

3.57%

+6.25%