EAIIX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
EAIIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 26, 2007. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund | 1.22% | 13.67% | -2.81% | 8.45% | -11.29% | -5.71% | 9.33% | 6.09% | -2.67% | 10.58% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -1.93% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAIIX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's -1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EAIIX has underperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 2.48%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.
EAIIX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 3.72%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAIIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EAIIX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
EAIIX
PFORX
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAIIX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 0.61 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | 0.86 | +3.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.12 | +0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 0.66 | +4.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.55 | 2.97 | +14.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAIIX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 0.61 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.33 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.91 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.25 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between EAIIX and PFORX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
EAIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than PFORX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund | 8.61% | 7.44% | 4.80% | 4.42% | 4.54% | 5.37% | 6.13% | 5.69% | 4.70% | 4.43% | 5.53% | 5.89% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.86% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAIIX drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAIIX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAIIX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.32% | -13.87% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.33% | -3.99% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.13% | -13.71% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.32% | -13.87% | -11.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -3.39% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -1.95% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.89% | -0.21% |
Volatility
EAIIX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) is 1.37%, while PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that EAIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EAIIX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 1.99% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | 2.55% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 3.39% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 3.47% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.50% | 3.08% | +2.42% |