PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAF vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAF achieves a -54.74% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.11% return.


EAF

1D
-7.39%
1M
-22.86%
YTD
-54.74%
6M
-56.42%
1Y
-36.18%
3Y*
-46.79%
5Y*
-43.33%
10Y*

VEA

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.98%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAF vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
-54.74%-10.35%-21.00%-53.81%-59.53%11.34%-6.94%4.40%-17.47%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.11%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-16.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EAF and VEA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.41

The correlation between EAF and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAF vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAF
EAF Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAF Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAF Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAFVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.33

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

2.62

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

10.06

-10.93

EAF vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAF Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAF and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAF drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAF and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAFVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.38%

-60.68%

-36.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.61%

-11.63%

-61.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.11%

-13.45%

-76.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.03%

-29.71%

-66.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.48%

-3.07%

-93.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.52%

-13.26%

-51.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.99%

3.02%

+38.97%

Volatility

EAF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) has a higher volatility of 26.22% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 7.09%. This indicates that EAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAFVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.22%

7.09%

+19.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.58%

14.74%

+69.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.28%

16.79%

+90.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.16%

16.76%

+67.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.66%

17.21%

+58.45%

Dividends

EAF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EAF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.91%0.84%0.34%1.08%2.93%8.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAF and VEA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAF has higher volatility (26.22%) compared to VEA (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAF dropped -97.38% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAF and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer