PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EAF vs. VEA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EAF and VEA is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

EAF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
38.62%
-5.80%
EAF
VEA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EAF:

-0.12

VEA:

0.29

Sortino Ratio

EAF:

0.55

VEA:

0.48

Omega Ratio

EAF:

1.06

VEA:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

EAF:

-0.13

VEA:

0.38

Martin Ratio

EAF:

-0.34

VEA:

0.96

Ulcer Index

EAF:

35.88%

VEA:

3.87%

Daily Std Dev

EAF:

99.57%

VEA:

12.80%

Max Drawdown

EAF:

-97.25%

VEA:

-60.69%

Current Drawdown

EAF:

-92.40%

VEA:

-9.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAF achieves a -12.72% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's -0.50% return.


EAF

YTD

-12.72%

1M

-25.62%

6M

38.53%

1Y

-11.18%

5Y*

-33.47%

10Y*

N/A

VEA

YTD

-0.50%

1M

-3.38%

6M

-5.81%

1Y

3.34%

5Y*

4.44%

10Y*

5.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAF vs. VEA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAF is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAF is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAF is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAF is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAF is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAF is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VEA is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VEA is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VEA is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VEA is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VEA is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VEA is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EAF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EAF, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.120.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for EAF, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.550.48
The chart of Omega ratio for EAF, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.061.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for EAF, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.130.38
The chart of Martin ratio for EAF, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.340.96
EAF
VEA

The current EAF Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAF and VEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.12
0.29
EAF
VEA

Dividends

EAF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EAF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.91%0.84%0.34%1.08%2.93%8.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
3.37%3.36%3.16%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%3.68%

Drawdowns

EAF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAF drawdown since its inception was -97.25%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAF and VEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-92.40%
-9.41%
EAF
VEA

Volatility

EAF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) has a higher volatility of 19.23% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 3.49%. This indicates that EAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
19.23%
3.49%
EAF
VEA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab