DUSA vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DUSA (Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUSA returned 23.39%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for BDGS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUSA charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

DUSA vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUSA achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.

DUSA

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 9.63%
• 1Y: 26.21%
• 3Y*: 23.39%
• 5Y*: 10.68%
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSA vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF	7.71%	22.57%	20.43%	26.51%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSA and BDGS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.59

The correlation between DUSA and BDGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DUSA vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUSA	BDGS
Financial Services	24.8%	9.3%
Healthcare	17.6%	7.5%
Communication Services	13.3%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	10.9%
Energy	10.9%	2.6%
Technology	7.9%	37.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	4.1%
Basic Materials	3.1%	1.5%
Industrials	2.4%	6.6%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

DUSA vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSA

DUSA Risk / Return Rank: 63
DUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
DUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSA vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUSA	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.29	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	3.40	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.47	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	3.45	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	16.47	-4.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUSA vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSA and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUSA	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.29	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	1.76	-1.11

Drawdowns

DUSA vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSA drawdown since its inception was -36.71%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSA and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUSA	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.71%	-9.12%	-27.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-4.03%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-9.12%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-0.83%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.73%	-0.64%	-6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	0.84%	+1.38%

Volatility

DUSA vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.14%. This indicates that DUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUSA	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.19%	1.14%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	4.74%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	6.08%	+6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	8.21%	+10.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	8.21%	+11.64%

DUSA vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSA has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUSA vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

DUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF	0.89%	0.96%	0.85%	3.38%	1.21%	1.12%	0.51%	1.12%	2.77%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUSA and BDGS in my portfolio?

DUSA and BDGS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUSA or BDGS?

DUSA has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to BDGS (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSA dropped -36.71% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, DUSA or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, DUSA leads with 23.39% vs 14.06% for BDGS. On fees, DUSA is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUSA or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, DUSA has performed better with a 23.39% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUSA or BDGS?

DUSA is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUSA or BDGS?

DUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between DUSA and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for DUSA and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.