DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) and Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L).
DRGN.L and PEMD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRGN.L is an actively managed fund by Legal & General. It was launched on Jul 20, 2021. PEMD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2017.
Performance
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 1.64% | 5.43% | 3.15% | 0.46% | -5.32% | 7.15% | 0.87% |
PEMD.L Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist | -1.32% | 12.80% | 6.20% | 10.59% | -16.57% | -2.57% | 1.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGN.L achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than PEMD.L's -1.32% return.
DRGN.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PEMD.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 8.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGN.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PEMD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRGN.L
PEMD.L
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) and Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRGN.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.30 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 1.93 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.26 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 1.94 | +2.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.90 | 8.11 | +11.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRGN.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.30 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.26 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.22 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGN.L and PEMD.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Dividend Comparison
DRGN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than PEMD.L's 5.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 1.68% | 1.94% | 2.31% | 2.45% | 2.76% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEMD.L Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 5.61% | 5.49% | 5.83% | 5.54% | 4.94% | 3.93% | 3.60% | 4.99% | 5.36% |
Drawdowns
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGN.L drawdown since its inception was -11.71%, smaller than the maximum PEMD.L drawdown of -26.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN.L and PEMD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGN.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -26.74% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -4.53% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.71% | -26.64% | +14.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -3.22% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -6.59% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 1.07% | -0.71% |
Volatility
DRGN.L vs. PEMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) is 2.25%, while Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that DRGN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRGN.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.75% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 3.95% | -1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 6.59% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 9.25% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 11.22% | -6.67% |