DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L).
DRGN.L and EMLP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRGN.L is an actively managed fund by Legal & General. It was launched on Jul 20, 2021. EMLP.L is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011.
Performance
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 1.64% | 5.43% | 3.15% | 0.46% | -5.32% | 7.15% | 0.87% |
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | -0.25% | 17.33% | -3.32% | 13.19% | -5.73% | -5.19% | 1.19% |
Different Trading Currencies
DRGN.L is traded in USD, while EMLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGN.L achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than EMLP.L's -0.25% return.
DRGN.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP.L
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGN.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP.L's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRGN.L
EMLP.L
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRGN.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.71 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 2.45 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.88 | 1.98 | +2.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.90 | 8.43 | +11.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRGN.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.71 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.17 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGN.L and EMLP.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Dividend Comparison
DRGN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while EMLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 1.68% | 1.94% | 2.31% | 2.45% | 2.76% | 1.44% |
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGN.L drawdown since its inception was -11.71%, smaller than the maximum EMLP.L drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN.L and EMLP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGN.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -20.02% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -4.29% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.71% | -11.25% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -2.93% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -6.14% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 1.21% | -0.85% |
Volatility
DRGN.L vs. EMLP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) is 2.25%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that DRGN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRGN.L | EMLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.82% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 4.69% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 6.88% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 9.08% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 9.37% | -4.82% |