DJIA vs. DYLG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DJIA (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF) and DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Global X - DJIA tracks the DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index while DYLG tracks the Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DJIA returned 10.61%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for DYLG. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DJIA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DYLG.

Performance

DJIA vs. DYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than DYLG's 8.59% return.

DJIA

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: 5.45%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 1Y: 17.26%
• 3Y*: 10.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.68%

DYLG

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 1Y: 20.19%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF	$1.40M	$1.28M	$1.40M
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	$29.24K	$30.29K	$73.30K

DJIA vs. DYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF	7.17%	9.11%	14.52%	1.59%
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	8.59%	12.50%	14.46%	4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and DYLG is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	0.73

The correlation between DJIA and DYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DJIA vs. DYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DJIA	DYLG
Financial Services	26.7%	26.7%
Industrials	18.9%	18.9%
Technology	16.1%	16.1%
Healthcare	13.2%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.3%
Communication Services	5.2%	5.2%
Basic Materials	3.9%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	3.9%
Energy	1.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DJIA vs. DYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DJIA

DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 80
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

DYLG

DYLG Risk / Return Rank: 79
DYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DJIA vs. DYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DJIA	DYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.97	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.80	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	2.30	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	9.40	-1.16

DJIA vs. DYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the DYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and DYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. DYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than DYLG's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and DYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DJIA	DYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.91%	-13.98%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.34%	-8.31%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.09%	-13.98%	+1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.15%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	-1.78%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.03%	-0.06%

Volatility

DJIA vs. DYLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) is 2.36%, while Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that DJIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DJIA	DYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	3.02%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.47%	7.91%	-1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.68%	9.70%	-2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.09%	11.35%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	11.35%	-0.26%

DJIA vs. DYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJIA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DJIA vs. DYLG - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, more than DYLG's 9.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF	10.44%	10.60%	11.44%	7.16%	9.18%
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	9.22%	9.63%	16.55%	1.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DJIA and DYLG in my portfolio?

DJIA and DYLG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DJIA or DYLG?

DYLG has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to DJIA (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs DYLG's -13.98%.

Which ETF is better, DJIA or DYLG?

On 3-year performance, DYLG leads with 13.16% vs 10.61% for DJIA. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DJIA has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DJIA or DYLG?

Over the 3-year period, DYLG has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DJIA or DYLG?

DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DJIA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DJIA or DYLG?

DJIA has the higher dividend yield at 10.44%, compared with 9.22% for DYLG.

What is the main difference between DJIA and DYLG?

DJIA tracks DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index, while DYLG tracks Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DJIA and 0.35% for DYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DJIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.