DILRX vs. FSKLX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA International Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DILRX) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX).
DILRX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012. FSKLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 29, 2015.
Performance
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DILRX DFA International Large Cap Growth Portfolio | -0.70% | 25.59% | 1.70% | 18.51% | -19.75% | 15.20% | 14.72% | 26.40% | -12.92% | 26.41% |
FSKLX Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund | 4.89% | 21.95% | 1.20% | 13.84% | -13.48% | 9.91% | -1.57% | 16.12% | -4.88% | 21.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DILRX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than FSKLX's 4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DILRX has outperformed FSKLX with an annualized return of 8.36%, while FSKLX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.20% annualized return.
DILRX
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
FSKLX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DILRX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKLX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DILRX vs. FSKLX — Risk / Return Rank
DILRX
FSKLX
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DILRX) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DILRX | FSKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 1.53 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 2.09 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.09 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 7.33 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DILRX | FSKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.53 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.52 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between DILRX and FSKLX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Dividend Comparison
DILRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FSKLX's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DILRX DFA International Large Cap Growth Portfolio | 1.96% | 1.98% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 2.56% | 2.37% | 1.34% | 2.09% | 2.55% | 1.94% | 2.40% | 2.34% |
FSKLX Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.47% | 2.59% | 2.09% | 2.31% | 2.01% | 2.42% | 1.32% | 6.06% | 2.64% | 1.69% | 2.85% | 1.10% |
Drawdowns
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DILRX drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, which is greater than FSKLX's maximum drawdown of -27.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DILRX and FSKLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DILRX | FSKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.19% | -27.26% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -8.64% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.02% | -24.99% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.19% | -27.26% | -4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.47% | -5.92% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -5.14% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.46% | +0.58% |
Volatility
DILRX vs. FSKLX - Volatility Comparison
DFA International Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DILRX) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX) at 4.55%. This indicates that DILRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DILRX | FSKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 4.55% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 7.50% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 12.34% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 11.45% | +4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 11.90% | +3.87% |