DHLX vs. FBCV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV).

DHLX and FBCV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DHLX is a passively managed fund by Diamond Hill that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Feb 26, 2021. FBCV is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 2, 2020.

Performance

DHLX vs. FBCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DHLX vs. FBCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF	-2.84%	1.24%
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	1.94%	6.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly lower than FBCV's 1.94% return.

DHLX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -6.17%
• YTD: -2.84%
• 6M: -1.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCV

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 8.25%
• 1Y: 15.87%
• 3Y*: 11.91%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHLX vs. FBCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCV's 0.57% expense ratio.

FBCV

Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF

DHLX

Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF

Return for Risk

DHLX vs. FBCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCV

FBCV Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FBCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FBCV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FBCV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHLX vs. FBCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DHLX	FBCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.85	-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between DHLX and FBCV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DHLX vs. FBCV - Dividend Comparison

DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than FBCV's 2.90% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF	0.42%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	2.90%	2.95%	1.75%	1.68%	2.01%	3.13%	0.44%

Drawdowns

DHLX vs. FBCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum FBCV drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and FBCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DHLX	FBCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.40%	-15.55%	+7.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.64%	-4.45%	-2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-3.53%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DHLX	FBCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	14.80%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.68%	13.86%	-2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.68%	14.84%	-3.16%