PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHIAX vs. DHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill International Fund (DHIAX) and Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund (DHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DHIAX
Diamond Hill International Fund
3.40%27.86%3.55%17.88%-13.82%12.41%6.48%7.92%
DHRAX
Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund
0.16%6.55%3.18%6.20%-12.05%-1.24%7.60%1.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHIAX achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than DHRAX's 0.16% return.


DHIAX

1D
2.66%
1M
-6.38%
YTD
3.40%
6M
7.10%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*

DHRAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHIAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than DHRAX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DHIAX vs. DHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHIAX
DHIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DHIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DHIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DHRAX
DHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill International Fund (DHIAX) and Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund (DHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHIAXDHRAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

1.02

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

1.48

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

1.69

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.98

4.72

+5.26

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the DHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHIAX and DHRAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHIAXDHRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.02

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.15

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.50

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between DHIAX and DHRAX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Dividend Comparison

DHIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, which matches DHRAX's 4.38% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHIAX
Diamond Hill International Fund
4.36%4.51%1.26%0.92%1.14%3.71%0.89%0.34%0.00%0.00%
DHRAX
Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund
4.38%4.02%4.72%4.05%2.63%1.99%2.05%2.49%2.69%2.24%

Drawdowns

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHIAX drawdown since its inception was -36.15%, which is greater than DHRAX's maximum drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHIAX and DHRAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DHIAXDHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.15%

-16.15%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-2.50%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

-16.15%

-14.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-1.79%

-5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-3.74%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

0.89%

+1.74%

Volatility

DHIAX vs. DHRAX - Volatility Comparison

Diamond Hill International Fund (DHIAX) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Diamond Hill Core Bond Fund (DHRAX) at 1.51%. This indicates that DHIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DHIAXDHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

1.51%

+5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

2.38%

+8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

3.92%

+11.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

5.48%

+9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

4.68%

+13.14%