DFSPX vs. JLGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX).
DFSPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 12, 2008. JLGMX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSPX DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio | -1.12% | 32.97% | 4.99% | 18.37% | -17.70% | 12.12% | 11.64% | 24.22% | -15.53% | 27.25% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -8.48% | 14.38% | 35.40% | 34.95% | -25.20% | 18.48% | 56.39% | 39.47% | 0.74% | 38.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSPX achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's -8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSPX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.
DFSPX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
JLGMX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -10.35%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSPX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFSPX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSPX
JLGMX
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSPX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 0.64 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.05 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.81 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 2.47 | +4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSPX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.64 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.85 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.80 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSPX and JLGMX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison
DFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than JLGMX's 12.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSPX DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio | 3.07% | 3.06% | 3.06% | 2.59% | 2.27% | 2.64% | 1.44% | 2.52% | 2.60% | 2.32% | 2.48% | 2.43% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 12.06% | 11.04% | 2.12% | 0.31% | 3.49% | 14.25% | 5.14% | 12.65% | 15.59% | 14.44% | 9.71% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSPX drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSPX and JLGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSPX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.86% | -31.82% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -16.73% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.68% | -31.13% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.86% | -31.82% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -13.83% | +4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -5.82% | -1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 5.51% | -2.52% |
Volatility
DFSPX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison
DFA International Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSPX) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 6.48%. This indicates that DFSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFSPX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 6.48% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.93% | 12.54% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 21.14% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 20.25% | -4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 21.54% | -5.38% |