DFISX vs. WHGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) and Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX).
DFISX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 30, 1996. WHGSX is managed by Westwood. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007.
Performance
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | -1.97% | 36.35% | 3.76% | 14.46% | -17.13% | 10.71% | 9.27% | 24.18% | -19.42% | 24.78% |
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund | 1.83% | -0.12% | 4.75% | 17.16% | -12.42% | 27.94% | 2.16% | 27.13% | -14.25% | 12.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFISX achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than WHGSX's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DFISX has underperformed WHGSX with an annualized return of 7.66%, while WHGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.40% annualized return.
DFISX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -11.77%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
WHGSX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFISX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WHGSX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFISX vs. WHGSX — Risk / Return Rank
DFISX
WHGSX
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) and Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFISX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 0.46 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 0.78 | +1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.10 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 0.63 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 1.96 | +6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFISX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.46 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.18 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.38 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.28 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFISX and WHGSX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Dividend Comparison
DFISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than WHGSX's 6.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | 3.21% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 3.01% | 3.51% | 3.06% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 7.74% | 1.27% | 4.44% | 4.47% |
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund | 6.00% | 6.11% | 6.37% | 4.06% | 3.67% | 4.69% | 0.65% | 1.04% | 7.20% | 7.25% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
Drawdowns
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFISX drawdown since its inception was -60.66%, which is greater than WHGSX's maximum drawdown of -56.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFISX and WHGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFISX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.66% | -56.51% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -14.68% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.06% | -26.67% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | -42.94% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -8.51% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -10.53% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 4.73% | -1.67% |
Volatility
DFISX vs. WHGSX - Volatility Comparison
DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) at 5.18%. This indicates that DFISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFISX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 5.18% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 12.07% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 20.16% | -4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 20.14% | -4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 22.05% | -5.94% |