DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE).
DDOC.DE and QDVG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DDOC.DE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health. It was launched on Dec 18, 2020. QDVG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both DDOC.DE and QDVG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDOC.DE Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD | -11.50% | -2.99% | 3.18% | -14.12% | -25.03% | -20.13% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -3.39% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 30.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDOC.DE achieves a -11.50% return, which is significantly lower than QDVG.DE's -3.39% return.
DDOC.DE
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- -11.50%
- 6M
- -17.15%
- 1Y
- -5.85%
- 3Y*
- -8.65%
- 5Y*
- -13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -3.39%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- -3.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDOC.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DDOC.DE
QDVG.DE
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DDOC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | -0.20 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | -0.16 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.16 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | -0.31 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDOC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | -0.20 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | 0.45 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.48 | -1.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DDOC.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDOC.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDOC.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than QDVG.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOC.DE and QDVG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDOC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -26.77% | -33.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.33% | -16.61% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.08% | -22.70% | -32.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.24% | -9.53% | -46.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -5.26% | -36.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.39% | 7.63% | +0.76% |
Volatility
DDOC.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) at 4.12%. This indicates that DDOC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DDOC.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 4.12% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 9.98% | +4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.74% | 17.58% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 14.35% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 15.78% | +8.55% |