PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZR vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CZR vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZR achieves a 27.19% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 20.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CZR has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 7.47%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.19% annualized return.


CZR

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.11%
6M
43.72%
YTD
27.19%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
-19.85%
5Y*
-19.38%
10Y*
7.47%
ALL TIME*
16.74%

MAR

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.03%
6M
18.71%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
47.30%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
21.60%
10Y*
19.19%
ALL TIME*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$92.73M$106.89M$189.59M
$498.48M$519.42M$558.67M

CZR vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
27.19%-30.01%-28.71%12.69%-55.52%25.93%24.53%64.71%9.23%95.58%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.64%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CZR and MAR is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014

0.44

The correlation between CZR and MAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CZR:

$6.06B

MAR:

$98.31B

EPS

CZR:

-$2.27

MAR:

$14.30

PS Ratio

CZR:

0.52

MAR:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

CZR:

$11.65B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CZR:

$3.59B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CZR:

$2.12B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CZR vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CZR
CZR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CZR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CZR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CZR vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CZRMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

3.38

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

9.06

-8.23

CZR vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZR Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZR and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CZR vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZR drawdown since its inception was -89.78%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZR and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CZRMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.78%

-75.59%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.91%

-12.65%

-22.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.95%

-30.50%

-37.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.82%

-30.50%

-54.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.78%

-61.26%

-28.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.10%

-7.38%

-67.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.42%

-14.86%

-17.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.01%

4.72%

+9.29%

Volatility

CZR vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR) is 2.90%, while Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that CZR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CZRMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

7.10%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.38%

19.70%

+13.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.39%

26.66%

+22.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.20%

28.68%

+23.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.84%

32.80%

+28.04%

Dividends

CZR vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

CZR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%

Financials

CZR vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CZR and MAR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAR has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to CZR (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZR dropped -89.78% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CZR and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer