CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO).
CWIN.TO and XDU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CWIN.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index. It was launched on Jan 27, 2025. XDU.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on Jun 7, 2017. Both CWIN.TO and XDU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 7.09% | 25.14% |
XDU.TO iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF | 6.97% | -1.00% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CWIN.TO having a 7.09% return and XDU.TO slightly lower at 6.97%.
CWIN.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDU.TO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWIN.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDU.TO's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CWIN.TO
XDU.TO
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWIN.TO | XDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 0.34 | +1.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 0.54 | +2.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.08 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 0.55 | +2.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.03 | 1.56 | +12.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWIN.TO | XDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.34 | +1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 0.54 | +1.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between CWIN.TO and XDU.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Dividend Comparison
CWIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than XDU.TO's 2.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWIN.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units | 3.04% | 3.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDU.TO iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF | 2.33% | 2.46% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.05% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 2.31% | 2.27% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum XDU.TO drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWIN.TO and XDU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWIN.TO | XDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -26.12% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -11.38% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.01% | -2.85% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -3.90% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 4.28% | -1.97% |
Volatility
CWIN.TO vs. XDU.TO - Volatility Comparison
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) at 3.59%. This indicates that CWIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CWIN.TO | XDU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 3.59% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 8.80% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 14.71% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 12.10% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 14.99% | -0.82% |